All Embedding Models
Tool Comparison

OpenAI text-embedding-3 vs Cohere embed-v4

A head-to-head comparison of two leading embedding models for AI-powered growth. See how they stack up on pricing, performance, and capabilities.

OpenAI text-embedding-3

Pricing: $0.02-0.13 per 1M tokens

Best for: Best general-purpose embeddings with flexible dimension tuning

Full review →

Cohere embed-v4

Pricing: Free trial, then $0.10 per 1M tokens

Best for: Multilingual applications and cross-language search

Full review →

Head-to-Head Comparison

CriteriaOpenAI text-embedding-3Cohere embed-v4
Accuracy (MTEB)Top-tier — text-embedding-3-large scores 64.6 on MTEBTop-tier — embed-v4 leads on multilingual retrieval benchmarks
Cost per 1M Tokens$0.02 (small) / $0.13 (large)$0.10 per 1M tokens (unified pricing)
Multilingual Support100+ languages but primarily optimized for English100+ languages with state-of-the-art cross-lingual retrieval
Self-HostingNot available — API onlyNot available — API only
Dimension Flexibility256 to 3072 — Matryoshka embeddings allow truncation without retrainingFixed 1024 dimensions for embed-v4

The Verdict

For English-first applications, OpenAI text-embedding-3-large delivers excellent accuracy at a lower cost than Cohere for comparable quality, and its Matryoshka architecture lets you trade dimension size against cost dynamically. Cohere embed-v4 leads when your retrieval needs to work across multiple languages, particularly for cross-lingual search where the query and documents may be in different languages. Neither model is self-hostable, so teams with data residency requirements should evaluate open-source alternatives.

Best Embedding Models by Industry

Related Reading

More Embedding Models comparisons